MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Using tele-health and web technologies to provide ACP education for informal caregivers

2012· article· en· W1990218554 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S.G. Grant

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Supportive & Palliative Care · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterprofessional Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth careCurriculumMedical educationPresentation (obstetrics)PsychologyNursingKnowledge managementMedicineComputer sciencePedagogyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Attendees will learn about a pilot project that engaged caregivers using tele-learning and web-technology to provide education on Advance Care Planning (ACP). The advantages of using the Care-Ring Voice Network include the national scope and reach to explicit caregiver communities, and convenience for participants who can access professional and multi-disciplinary experts on ACP from the comfort of their own home. In association with Solutions-East Toronto's Health Collaborative (Solutions), VHA Home HealthCare (VHA) led in the development, implementation and evaluation of a new and innovative tele-learning program for caregivers, in particular those falling in the ‘sandwich generation’ category. As a member of Solutions, a local collaborative involving a full continuum of health care organisations, VHA championed joining Care-Ring Voice and testing their technology to increase knowledge and reduce stress of caregivers. Care-Ring Voice connects caregivers and families to information and support through the use of tele-learning. The network hosts learning sessions by telephone and the web on a range of topics relevant to informal caregivers. Participants benefit by learning from healthcare professionals leading the workshops and by sharing with others in similar situations. Care-Ring Voice is a national network but currently membership is largest in Quebec and British Columbia. The consultative approach used to develop the five-week ‘Ring and Reach’ series curriculum, involving professionals from across the healthcare continuum, will be highlighted as well as the evaluation methods and findings. The presentation will highlight predictors of program success, challenges and barriers to caregiver participation, and strategies for future offerings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.552
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.520
Teacher spread0.422 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Supportive & Palliative CareSame topicInterprofessional Education and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207