MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990254661 · doi:10.1159/000260859

The Microflora Associated with the Progression of Incipient Carious Lesions in Teeth of Children Living in a Water-Fluoridated Area

2009· article· en· W1990254661 on OpenAlexaff
R.M. Boyar, G. H. Bowden

Bibliographic record

VenueCaries Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicOral microbiology and periodontitis research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActinomyces naeslundiiVeillonellaActinomycesStreptococcus mutansLesionMedicineDentistryPathologyStreptococcusBiologyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radiographically diagnosed incipient approximal carious lesions in deciduous molar teeth and control sites were sampled microbiologically at 6- or 12-week intervals for at least 12 months. Microbiological findings were related to radiographically diagnosed progression or non-progression of the lesions. Lactobacillus appeared at the site of 85% of progressive lesions before clinical diagnosis of progression was made and was never isolated from non-progressive lesions or control sites. Significant positive associations were detected between Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus, Veillonella and Actinomyces odontolyticus and progressive lesions. Singificant negative associations were detected with Streptococcus mitior, Actinomyces naeslundii and Actinomyces viscosus. Comparison of the data from control surfaces in subjects with and without progressive lesions suggested that the former were more highly colonized with S. mutans. The data emphasizes the significance of S. mutans and Lactobacillus in lesion progression and draws attention to a role of A. odontolyticus. The negative association suggests a shift in the flora with a reduction in S. mitior and A. viscosus and A. naeslundii in progressive lesions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCaries ResearchSame topicOral microbiology and periodontitis researchFrench-language works237,207