Selective Templated Growth of Polypyrrole Strands on Lipid Tubule Edges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The synthesis of polymers (particularly conducting polymers) in confined areas and volumes is of great interest as a strategy in microstructure and nanostructure fabrication. Our interest is oriented toward the formation of new morphologies created by preferential surface templating. In this report, we describe the polymerization of pyrrole (py) in the presence of diacetylenic phospholipid tubules. These tubules, much studied by Schnur, Yager, and co-workers, 1 are ∼500 nm wide and several micrometers long. Ppy growth is templated specifically on the edges/seams of the tubule and not on its walls. An unusual long strand morphology (10−100 nm wide and micrometers long) results. Attempts to alter the balance between template (i.e., edged-localized) polymerization and solution polymerization reveals that the propensity for template polymerization is overwhelmingly large. The properties of the Ppy thus obtained, and possible templating mechanisms are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".