MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990260893 · doi:10.1190/1.1649373

Traveltime calculation and prestack depth migration in tilted transversely isotropic media

2004· article· en· W1990260893 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dhananjay Kumar, Mrinal K. Sen, Robert J. Ferguson

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransverse isotropyGeologyComputationSeismic migrationGeometryEikonal equationExtrapolationIsotropyThrustNormal moveoutAlgorithmAnisotropySeismologyGeodesyMathematical analysisMathematicsOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The principal objective of our work is to develop a technique for prestack depth migration in tilted transversely isotropic (TTI) media in which the axis of symmetry is not vertical and may be spatially varying. Such models are required to image seismic data in geologically complex regions such as the Canadian Foothills. We have developed a 2D Kirchhoff integral-based migration algorithm in which the traveltime computation comprises the major task. Among the existing traveltime computation algorithms such as ray tracing with interpolation, ray bending, and eikonal solvers, a direct or a brute force approach of traveltime computation is generally highly robust. We have modified a direct method of first-arrival P-wave traveltime computation in 2D media that accounts for TTI. The algorithm requires that the group velocity be computed at each gridpoint, using either an analytic solution or by an approximate Fourier series expansion. The P-wave traveltime contours computed for complex geologic models show the pronounced effects from TTI media. Our results, using laboratory P-wave data collected over a physical model of an anisotropic thrust sheet, reveal that a 2D Kirchhoff migration based on our traveltime algorithm (TTI model) images the structure beneath the thrust sheet very well. The vertical transversely isotropic (assuming a vertical axis of symmetry) or isotropic imaging introduces false anticlinal structures. We compare our results with those obtained by a recursive-extrapolation method and find that our approach images the underside of one of the thrust sheets better.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.651
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207