MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990380138 · doi:10.2118/168140-ms

The Time-Dependent Permeability Damage Caused by Fracture Fluid

2014· article· en· W1990380138 on OpenAlex
Neil Bostrom, Maxim Chertov, Markus Pagels, D. M. Willberg, A. Chertova, Matthew Davis, W Zagórski

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermeability (electromagnetism)Spark plugRelative permeabilityImbibitionPetroleum engineeringGeologyHydraulic fracturingFluid dynamicsSaturation (graph theory)Geotechnical engineeringPorosityMechanicsChemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hydraulic fracturing causes a large amount of fluid to leak off into unconventional reservoirs and the fluid is not recovered through flowback. The fluids enter the pore structure of the formation, and the presence of the invading phase blocks the in-situ phase. This event reduces permeability, particularly in unconventional reservoirs. Operators shut-in the well for an arbitrary amount of time after fracturing. The time could allow the phase blocks to dissipate, increasing permeability. Conventional core flow tests and relative permeability evaluations using centrifuge drainage tests are unreliable—if not impossible—in these ultralow-permeability unconventional rocks. We present a method to measure the gas permeability on core plugs of mudstones at reservoir conditions, both before and periodically after the plug was exposed to fracture fluid. The change in gas permeability over time allows optimization of the shut-in time. In addition, the combined rate of leakoff and imbibition is measured while the material is exposed to fluid. At the conclusion of the test, the axial water profile is determined by measuring unconfined compressive strength using the mechanical scratch machine and water saturation with Karl Fisher titration. Initially, the samples are saturated with gas and have the highest permeability. As the plug is then exposed to water, water imbibes into the core forming a water block. The water is removed from the face of the plug. Immediately after the core was exposed to water, the permeability drops below the detection limit. In most core tested, the water block dissipates over time increasing the permeability. Experimental results on core plugs from two major shale plays show that imbibition and fluid loss into ultralow-permeability rock can be substantial, but these processes are also highly variable. We developed a measure of the phase block dissipation. The information gives operators a quantitative measure to determine the length of shut-in periods and for the development of other methods to minimize the damage from water imbibition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it