MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990432191 · doi:10.1524/zpch.2012.0285

Multinuclear NMR Study of Zinc Dicyanide

2012· article· en· W1990432191 on OpenAlexaff
Ulrike Werner‐Zwanziger, Karena W. Chapman, Josef W. Zwanziger

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicThermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBond lengthIsotropyChemistryNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyCrystallographyNitrogenPair distribution functionResonance (particle physics)DipoleMolecular geometryDiffractionZincDistribution functionNuclear magnetic resonanceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Atomic physicsStereochemistryMoleculePhysicsThermodynamicsOrganic chemistryCrystal structure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The isotropic negative expansion of Zn(CN) 2 has been linked to a temperature induced increase in off-axis tilting of the C–N bond direction and an increase in CN-bond length. However, the bond length could be determined only indirectly based on pair-distribution function analysis and was found to be surprisingly large. Here we study Zn(CN) 2 by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and first principles calculations. By using samples enriched in 13 C and 15 N the dipole coupling between carbon and nitrogen is determined, and from this an upper bound on the C–N bond length of 1.19 ± 0.01 Å is derived. This quantity agrees with earlier determinations based on diffraction but is shorter than estimates based on pair distribution function analysis. The relation of this estimate to possible dynamics in the sample is discussed. Finally, 67 Zn NMR is used together with first principles calculations to assess disorder in the material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZeitschrift für Physikalische ChemieSame topicThermal Expansion and Ionic ConductivityFrench-language works237,207