MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W199044516

Development of a 25-mA, 12% duty factor(df) H-source for LANSCE.

2004· paratext· en· W199044516 on OpenAlexaff
A.H. Arvin, E. Chacon-Golcher, E. Geros, Edward Jacobson, B. Meyer, Peter Naffziger, G. Rouleau, S.C. Schaller, Joseph D. Sherman, J.E. Stelzer, T. Zaugg

Bibliographic record

VenueOSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · 2004
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsSt. Peter's Hospital
FundersNational Nuclear Security Administration
KeywordsThermal emittancePhysicsDuty cycleLinear particle acceleratorNeutron sourceStorage ringIon sourceCommon emitterBunchesParticle acceleratorNuclear physicsNeutronElectrical engineeringOpticsOptoelectronicsVoltageElectronBeam (structure)EngineeringPlasma
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Present operations at the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (LANSCE) accelerator use a surface conversion source to provide 80-keV, 16 to 18-mA H{sup -} beams with typical lab emittance of 7({pi}cm-mrad). Operational flexibility of the 800-MeV linac, proton storage ring, and other experimental facilities will be increased by a higher current if source. The present goal is to achieve a 25 mA H{sup -} surface converter source with modest (20%) emittance increase without sacrificing the present LANSCE production source 12% df and 28-day lifetime. The LANSCE 80-kV ion source test stand (ISTS) has been brought into reliable 24-hour per day operation with computer control and modern electronics. A fourth production source has been fabricated, and is now operating on the ISTS. H{sup -} currents up to 25 mA have been observed with 8-9 ({pi}cm-mrad) lab emittances. An experimental study of surface converter geometries and electron filters at the emitter electrode are planned to optimize source current and emittance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207