Rate of decay of specific surface area of snow during isothermal experiments and morphological changes studied by scanning electron microscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The quantification of the specific surface area (SSA) of snow crystals and of its variation during metamorphism are essential to understand and model the exchange of reactive gases between the snowpack and the atmosphere. Therefore, the decay rate of SSA of five fresh snow samples was studied in the laboratory at 4, 10, and 15°C under isothermal conditions in closed systems. The time-evolution of the snow SSA can in all cases be very well described by an empirical law of the form, SSA = A log(t + Δt) + B, where A, B, and Δt are adjustable parameters. B seems to be closely related to the initial SSA of the snow, and A describes the SSA decay rate. Our preliminary findings at 15°C suggest that a linear relationship exists between A and B, so that it may be possible to predict the decay rate of snow SSA from its initial value. For the first time, images obtained from scanning electron microscopy show that crystal rounding of snow is the main process taking place during isothermal metamorphism. New grain boundaries also form. More surprising, however, was the formation of new basal, prismatic, and pyramidal crystal faces, sometimes with very sharp angles, especially at 15°C. The growth of facets with sharp angles is not fully explained by current theories of snow metamorphism and has not been observed before. PACS Nos.: 68.35Md, 68.37Hk, 81.20Ev, 81.05Rm
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".