MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990499846 · doi:10.1109/tsg.2015.2418790

Indirect Load Shaping for CHP Systems Through Real-Time Price Signals

2015· article· en· W1990499846 on OpenAlexaff
Kan Zhou, Jianping Pan, Lin Cai

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLyapunov optimizationComputer scienceQueueing theoryQueueSmart gridMathematical optimizationOptimization problemElectric power systemDistributed computingPower (physics)EngineeringLyapunov equationComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Direct or centralized loading shaping in smart grid has been heavily investigated. However, it is usually not clear how the users are compensated by providing load shaping services. In this paper, we will discuss indirect load shaping in a distributed manner. On one hand, we aim to reduce the users' energy cost by investigating how to fully utilize the battery pack and the water tank for the combined heat and power (CHP) systems. We first formulate the queueing models for the CHP systems and then propose an algorithm based on the Lyapunov optimization technique, which does not need any statistical information about the system dynamics. The optimal control actions can be obtained by solving a nonconvex optimization problem. We then discuss when it can be converted into a convex optimization problem. Since the CHP battery pack queue and water tank queue are correlated, the capacity relationship between them is further explored considering different queue weights. On the other hand, based on the users' reaction model, we propose an algorithm with a time complexity of O(log n) to determine the real-time price for the power company to effectively coordinate all the CHP systems and provide distributed load shaping services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Smart GridSame topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207