Apoptotic Phenotype Alters the Capacity of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand to Induce Human Vascular Endothelial Activation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The ability of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) to activate vascular endothelium is unclear. This study investigates the link between endothelial apoptosis and activation in response to TRAIL. METHODS AND RESULTS: Endothelial cell apoptosis was modeled with the immortalized human endothelial cell line EA.hy926, and with primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) sensitized with the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor LY294002 in 1% serum. EA.hy926 expressed greatest levels of TRAIL receptors R1 and R2, and HUVEC of R2 and R3, determined by flow cytometry. Recombinant human (rh)TRAIL induced apoptosis in both models, reducing cell numbers preventable with caspase inhibitors, and confirmed by annexin V staining. In EA.hy926, rhTRAIL activated NF-kappaB (1 h) with increased ICAM-1 expression (24 h). rhTRAIL also increased adhesion of human neutrophils, blocked with an antibody to neutrophil CD18, a ligand for ICAM-1, and with antibodies to TRAIL and TRAIL-R1 and R2. rhTRAIL increased neutrophil adhesion to sensitized HUVEC, without effect on unmodified HUVEC. rhTRAIL did not increase surface labeling of ICAM-1 or E-selectin in sensitized HUVEC. CONCLUSIONS: TRAIL increases neutrophil adhesion when it concurrently induces apoptosis both in EA.hy926 and in sensitized HUVEC. TRAIL may therefore induce endothelial activation in concert with endothelial apoptosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".