Dunstan, Aethelwold, and Isidorean Exegesis in Old English Glosses: Oxford, Bodleian Library Bodley 319
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oxford, Bodleian Library Bodley 319 is one of the three manuscripts written by the scribe of the Exeter Book of Old English poetry in the later tenth century; it was originally entirely in Latin, but an Old English gloss was added to the last chapter in the eleventh century. This paper argues that the gloss shares lexical and stylistic features with a group of Old English texts recently linked to the important Benedictine reformer and author, Æthelwold of Winchester. This affiliation with these Old English texts, especially the Royal Psalter (London, British Library Royal 2.B.v), suggests that the copy of Isidore's De fide catholica in Bodley 319 was studied in the intellectual circles of Æthelwold and Dunstan in the decades following their time together in Glastonbury in the mid-tenth century. Like the Royal Psalter, the Bodley 319 gloss reveals an experimental foray into reproducing the complexities of Latin typological thought in the vernacular. Furthermore, the connections between Bodley 319 and this specific intellectual and literary milieu can shed light on the earlier history of Bodley 319 and perhaps its sister manuscripts, London, Lambeth Palace 149 and the Exeter Book. Drawing a connection between the three manuscripts—including one of the most important Anglo-Saxon poetic collections—and Dunstan and Æthelwold provides a new context for understanding the emergence of the literary vernacular in the later tenth and early eleventh centuries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".