MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990616368 · doi:10.1063/1.2976568

Application of magnetically perturbed time-dependent density functional theory to magnetic circular dichroism. III. Temperature-dependent magnetic circular dichroism induced by spin-orbit coupling

2008· article· en· W1990616368 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael Seth, Tom Ziegler, Jochen Autschbach

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular spectroscopy and chirality
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsTime-dependent density functional theoryMagnetic circular dichroismCircular dichroismDensity functional theoryVibrational circular dichroismX-ray magnetic circular dichroismSpin–orbit interactionSpectral lineMolecular physicsPhysicsMagnetic dipoleAtomic physicsChemistryDipoleCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanicsCrystallography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A methodology for calculating the temperature-dependent magnetic circular dichroism (MCD) of open-shell molecules with time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) is described. The equations for the MCD of an open-shell molecule including spin-orbit coupling in the low- and high-temperature limits are reviewed. Two effects lead to the temperature-dependent MCD: the breaking of degeneracies and the perturbation of transition dipoles by spin-orbit coupling. The equations necessary to evaluate the required terms using TDDFT-derived quantities are presented. The performance of the formalism is demonstrated through application to the MCD of several molecules. The spectra of these molecules have differing properties with respect to bandwidth, temperature dependence of the MCD, and relative magnitude of the temperature-dependent and temperature-independent components of the MCD. The important features of the experimental spectra are reproduced by the calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicMolecular spectroscopy and chiralityFrench-language works237,207