EPA-0077 - Volume of caudate nucleus in major depressive disorder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a disabling illness characterized by sadness, guilt and melancholia, and is the third most common cause of disability worldwide according to the World Health Organization. Studies have shown the caudate nucleus to be implicated in emotion and reward, as emotional networks are localized to the head of caudate. Smaller caudate nuclei volumes have been noted in depressed patients. This study aimed to investigate whether volumetric abnormalities in the caudate nuclei were significant in the pathogenesis of MDD. We hypothesized that a smaller caudate nucleus would be present in adult MDD patients. 19 healthy controls (8 males and 11 females, ages 20-52) and 51 MDD patients (18 males and 33 females, ages 19-58) underwent magnetic resonance imaging and volume of the caudate nuclei was determined by performing manual tracing using Analyze Direct 10.0 by a trained and reliable rater. No significant differences were found between healthy controls and MDD patients in the right, left and total caudate volumes. However, there was a negative correlation between age, and right, left and total caudate volumes in both MDD patients and controls. Right caudate volume correlated with change in depression scale scores with treatment in MDD patients. Also, a trend for larger right caudate volumes in the treatment responder group was observed. These findings differ with previous literature; possible reasons for this include medication history or differing methods of caudate nucleus measurement. This data suggests that right caudate nucleus volume may be predictive of treatment response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".