Assessment of urodynamic and detrusor contractility variables in patients with overactive bladder syndrome treated with botulinum toxin‐A: is incomplete bladder emptying predictable?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether incomplete bladder emptying and the need for clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) is predictable, by analysing urodynamic and detrusor contractility variables in patients treated with botulinum toxin-A (BTX-A) for refractory idiopathic detrusor overactivity (IDO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-seven patients (mean age 50.3) with IDO, from two centres, had bladder injections of 200 U BTX-A. Patients with difficulty in emptying their bladder and/or persistent overactive bladder symptoms, with postvoid residual volumes (PVR) of >150 mL after treatment were started on CISC. Urodynamics were conducted at baseline, 4 and 12-16 weeks after injection with BTX-A. Detrusor contractility was assessed using the projected isovolumetric pressure (PIP1) in women and bladder contractility index (BCI) in men. RESULTS: There were improvements in the mean maximum cystometric capacity, bladder compliance and maximum detrusor pressures during filling cystometry after BTX-A injections. The PVR was significantly increased at 4 but not at 12 weeks. Nineteen patients required CISC and when compared with those not needing CISC their pretreatment maximum flow rate (15 vs 22 mL/s, P = 0.003), PIP1 (43 vs 58, P = 0.02) and BCI (113 vs 180, P = 0.001) were lower. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis suggested that a PIP1 of < or =50 in women (sensitivity 0.83; specificity 0.70; area under the curve 0.822) and BCI < or =120 (sensitivity 0.7; specificity 0.79; area 0.879) might predict the need for CISC. CONCLUSION: The maximum flow rate, PIP1 and BCI were significantly lower in patients who required CISC after BTX-A treatment than in those who did not. A PIP1 of < or =50 in women and a BCI of < or =120 might be predictive of a need for CISC in this setting, and might help when counselling patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".