Magnetoconductance oscillations at a nanoparticle film–superconductor interface: a means for probing flux penetration depth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interfaces between disordered normal materials and superconductors (S) can exhibit 'reflectionless tunnelling' (RT)-a phenomenon that arises from repeated disorder-driven elastic scattering, multiple Andreev reflections, and electron/hole interference. RT has been used to explain zero-bias conductance peaks (ZBCPs) observed using doped semiconductors and evaporated granular metal films as the disordered normal materials. Recently, in addition to ZBCPs, magnetoconductance oscillations predicted by RT theory have been observed using a novel normal disordered material: self-assembled nanoparticle films. In the present study, we find that the period of these oscillations decreases as temperature (T) increases. This suggests that the magnetic flux associated with interfering pathways increases accordingly. We propose that the increasing flux can be attributed to magnetic field penetration into S as [Formula: see text]. This model agrees remarkably well with known T dependence of penetration depth predicted by Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer theory. Our study shows that this additional region of flux is significant and must be considered in experimental and theoretical studies of RT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".