MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

FC16 A prospective randomised trial of sentinel node biopsy for high risk non-melanoma skin cancer (SNIC TRIAL)

2010· article· en· W1990683100 on OpenAlex
R.C. Martin, Wendy Kelder, Kathryn Roth, Rajmohan Murali, R. Uren, Anne‐Laure Martin, Jonathan R. Clark

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMelanoma Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSentinel nodeLymphadenectomyMelanomaBiopsySentinel lymph nodeStage (stratigraphy)Lymph nodeRandomized controlled trialSkin cancerSurgeryCancerOncologyRadiologyInternal medicineBreast cancerCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Non-melanoma skin cancers are the most common skin cancers in the world. The majority do not metastasize, but those that do cause significant morbidity and mortality. Although it is not exactly known which tumours metastasize, certain risk factors have been recognized. These will be used to identify those at highest risk of lymph node metastases. By using the Sentinel Node Biopsy (SNB) we can identify and treat those that have metastasized at an early stage. Hypothesis Identification of early metastases and their treatment might improve survival and surgical morbidity of patients compared to more extensive surgery for delayed, more advanced lymph node disease. AimsPrimary aim To analyze disease free survival for patients with high risk non-melanoma skin cancer who undergo wide excision and sentinel node biopsy and immediate completion lymph node clearance in case of a positive sentinel node versus patients who undergo wide excision of the primary lesion with postoperative serial ultrasound observation of the regional lymphatic basin. Secondary aims To analyze overall and disease specific survival for both groups as well as for node positive patients per group and to monitor the morbidity of SNB and early versus delayed lymphadenectomy in high risk non-melanoma skin cancer. To detect genetic profiles corresponding to metastatic patterns in the primary tumour. Design The trial is a phase III, international, multicentre, randomized trial. In arm 1 of the study the treatment will be wide local excision of the skin tumour and sentinel node biopsy, followed by immediate lymphadenectomy in case of metastases in the sentinel node. In arm 2 of the study the treatment consists of wide local excision and nodal observation with ultra-sound follow up for 5 years. Lymph node metastases in the follow up will be treated by delayed lymphadenectomy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it