Activation of Isoflavone Biosynthesis in Excised Cotyledons of Lupinus Seedlings by Jasmonoids and Excess Light
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Exogenous jasmonic acid (JA) and methyl jasmonate (MJ) induced accumulation of isoflavone constituents in cotyledons prepared from imbibed seeds of white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Exogenous 0.2 mM MJ enhanced the levels of 7-O-(6"-O-malonyl)glucosylgenistein and 7-O-glucosylgenistein in the cotyledons of etiolated seedlings that had been incubated in the dark for 48 h. Regarding isoflavone induced by excision and slicing in the cotyledons as background level, the effect of light was 2- to 3-fold higher than that of 0.2 mM MJ. Cotyledons exposed to MJ along with a 24-h light period displayed a higher level of isoflavone accumulation than that of light alone. Total molar amounts of isoflavone accumulated in the cotyledons treated with MJ under continuous light were approximately the sum of those induced by MJ alone and light alone, respectively. The additive-like effect of MJ and light on isoflavone accumulation in lupin tissues suggested the presence of two different signaling systems independently responsible for those two stimuli. Excised cotyledons from etiolated yellow lupin (L. luteus L. cv. Topaz) seedlings also supported this hypothesis. The cotyledons could accumulate both an isoflavone and a flavone, and MJ selectively increased some of the isoflavone constituents, whereas light enhanced the levels of both. The selective accumulation mechanism of isoflavonoids in cotyledons, in which jasmonoids are involved, clearly differed from that activated by light.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".