Molecular diversity of the 5S rDNA units in the<i>Elymus dahuricus</i>complex (Poaceae: Triticeae) supports the genomic constitution of<b>St</b>,<b>Y</b>, and<b>H</b>haplomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The phylogenetic analysis of 118 5S rRNA gene sequences cloned from members of the Elymus dahuricus complex containing the St, Y, and H haplomes, and of several related species containing at least one of these three haplomes, is reported. Differences in sequence pattern, primarily within the nontranscribed spacer, enabled the identification of six putative orthologous groups that we refer to as unit classes. In previous publications, we have been able to assign unit classes to haplomes. In addition to four unit classes previously identified in other genera, namely the long H1, long S1, long P1, and long {Y1, here we document two new unit classes called the long S2 and long W1. Most sequences of the E. dahuricus complex and related tetraploid species are classified as long S1 and assigned to the St haplome. Both long S1 and long S2 unit classes were identified in the diploid Pseudoroegneria spicata (Pursh) Á. Löve with the St haplome. The long S2 unit class was also identified in the hexaploid Elymus scabrus (R. Br.) Á. Löve with the St,Y,and W haplomes. The long P1 was known from the diploid Agropyron cristatum Gaertn. with the P haplome, and the long W1 was determined in Australopyrum retrofractum (Vickery) Á. Löve, known to contain the W haplome, but was not yet detected in E. scabrus, a hexaploid species with W being one of the three haplomes. The long H1 reported earlier from Hordeum was identified in several clones of the E. dahuricus complex. As previously reported, the long {Y1 unit class was found to be rare overall, but we identified it in a few clones of Elymus drobovii and in the E. dahuricus complex.Key words: 5S rDNA, unit classes, haplomes, concerted evolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".