High-Dose Intravascular β-Radiation After De Novo Stent Implantation Induces Coronary Artery Spasm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intracoronary brachytherapy is effective in preventing restenosis after coronary interventions. However, in vitro and animal studies have shown that irradiation produces immediate and sustained endothelial dysfunction. This study assesses the clinical relevance of impaired vasomotoric function induced by brachytherapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed the occurrence of postradiation coronary artery spasms in 1 animal study and 2 clinical trials investigating the effects of high-dose intracoronary beta-radiation after de novo coronary artery stenting. Irradiated segments (IRSs) proximal and distal to the stent were studied by quantitative coronary angiography after stenting, after radiation, and at the end of the procedure. There was an 67% overall incidence of coronary artery spasm in the IRSs immediately after beta-radiation compared with 9% after sham treatment (P<0.001). Whereas in most cases this phenomenon was only minor or moderate, in 12 cases, 4 (22%) animals and 8 (28%) patients, severe coronary spasm (>90% diameter stenosis) with significant ECG-changes or hemodynamic instability was observed. Relief of spasms was protracted (mean time until complete relief of spasm 423+/-122 seconds) and required repetitive intracoronary administration of nitroglycerin (mean dose: 1.2+/-0.6 mg). CONCLUSIONS: Vasoconstriction is a frequent reaction of coronary arteries after high-dose intracoronary beta-radiation, necessitating repetitive administration of vasodilators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".