Kinetic analysis of the interactions between Troponin C (TnC) and Troponin I (TnI) binding peptides: evidence for separate binding sites for the ‘structural’ N‐terminus and the ‘regulatory’ C‐terminus of TnI on TnC
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Ca(2+)/Mg(2+)-dependent interactions between TnC and TnI play a critical role in regulating the 'on' and 'off' states of muscle contraction as well as maintaining the structural integrity of the troponin complex in the off state. In the present study, we have investigated the binding interactions between the N-terminus of TnI (residues 1-40 of skeletal TnI) and skeletal TnC in the presence of Ca(2+) ions, Mg(2+) ions and in the presence of the C-terminal regulatory region peptides: TnI(96-115), TnI(96-131) and TnI(96-139). Our results show the N-terminus of TnI can bind to TnC with high affinity in the presence of Ca(2+) or Mg(2+) ions with apparent equilibrium dissociation constants of K(d(Ca(2+) ) ) = 48 nM and K(d(Mg(2+) ) ) = 29 nM. The apparent association and dissociation rate constants for the interactions were, k(on) = 4.8 x 10(5) M (-1) s(-1), 3.4 x 10(5) M (-1) s(-1) and k(off) = 2.3 x 10(-2) s(-1), 1.0 x 10(-2) s(-1) for TnC(Ca(2+)) and TnC(Mg(2+)) states, respectively. Competition studies between each of the TnI regions and TnC showed that both TnI regions can bind simultaneously to TnC while native gel electrophoresis and SEC confirmed the formation of stable ternary complexes between TnI(96-139) (or TnI(96-131)) and TnC-TnI(1-40). Further analysis of the binding interactions in the ternary complex showed the binding of the TnI regulatory region to TnC was critically dependent upon the presence of both TnC binding sites (i.e. TnI(96-115) and TnI(116-131)) and the presence of Ca(2+). Furthermore, the presence of TnI(1-40) slightly weakened the affinity of the regulatory peptides for TnC. Taken together, these results support the model for TnI-TnC interaction where the N-terminus of TnI remains bound to the C-domain of TnC in the presence of high and low Ca(2+) levels while the TnI regulatory region (residues 96-139) switches in its binding interactions between the actin-tropomyosin thin filament and its own sites on the N- and C-domain of TnC at high Ca(2+) levels, thus regulating muscle contraction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".