MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990784032 · doi:10.1109/icc.2014.6883682

Energy-efficient resource allocation in full-duplex relaying networks

2014· article· en· W1990784032 on OpenAlexaff
Gang Liu, Hong Ji, F. Richard Yu, Yi Li, Renchao Xie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFull-Duplex Wireless Communications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsStackelberg competitionComputer scienceEfficient energy useResource allocationGame theorySubgame perfect equilibriumSubgameMathematical optimizationTransmitter power outputSpectral efficiencyIterative methodTelecommunications linkBandwidth (computing)Computer networkNash equilibriumTransmitterBest responseAlgorithmMathematicsEngineeringMathematical economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent advances of loop interference cancellation techniques enable full-duplex relaying (FDR) systems, which transmit and receive simultaneously in the same band with high spectrum efficiency. Unlike the existing works, in this paper, we study the energy efficiency aspect of resource allocation in FDR systems. We consider a OFDMA cellular network, where a shared FDR is deployed at the intersection of three sectors in a cell. Firstly, the problem of energy-efficient joint bandwidth sharing and power allocation is formulated as a three-stage Stackelberg game. Secondly, the subgame perfect equilibrium for each stage is analyzed. Then, the interplays of the three-stage game are discussed and an iterative algorithm is proposed to obtain the Stackelberg equilibrium solution. At last, simulation results are presented to show the effectiveness of the proposed game.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFull-Duplex Wireless CommunicationsFrench-language works237,207