MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990786003 · doi:10.1159/000047115

Changes in the G Gamma- and A Gamma-Globin mRNA Components of Fetal Hemoglobin during Human Development

2001· article· en· W1990786003 on OpenAlexaff
Harry Bard, Krishna G. Peri, Carmen Gagnon

Bibliographic record

VenueNeonatology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobinFetal hemoglobinBiologyMessenger RNAMolecular biologyHemoglobinGamma globulinFetusGeneGeneticsAntibodyPregnancyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To determine the postnatal developmental changes in (G)gamma- and (A)gamma-globin mRNAs of HbF, blood samples were obtained from 28 pre-term infants born at < or = 33 weeks of gestation (27.9 +/- 2.5), 9 term-born infants and 26 adults. Adult samples were used to determine the relationship between the levels (G)gamma- and (A)gamma-mRNAs of HbF and the-158 (C-->T) variation in the promoter region of the (G)gamma-globin gene. The results showed that (G)gamma-globin mRNA to total gamma-globin mRNAs remained around 66% (66.2 +/- 4) until the 44 week of postconceptual age when a change in the (G)gamma- and (A)gamma-globin mRNA proportions occurred. The immature red cells of adults had a range of (G)gamma-globin mRNA to total gamma-globin mRNAs varying from 20 to 74% (53.1 +/- 16.9). The high levels of (G)gamma-globin mRNA to total gamma-globin mRNAs are associated with the presence of a -158 (C-->T) polymorphism. The gene frequency of polymorphism was 0.32.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeonatologySame topicHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207