Orbitofacial Cleft Number 5: Radiographic, Anatomical, and Histologic Study of a 24-Week-Old Fetus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Orbitofacial clefts are caused by a congenital absence of midfacial tissues between the eye and the upper lip just medial to the corner of the mouth. As a whole, facial clefts occur with an incidence of 1.43 to 4.85 per 100,000 births. The exact incidence of these unusual orbital facial clefts is unknown. Only a few clinical cases and their treatment have been reported in the world literature, and no anatomical or histologic study has been presented. METHODS: The authors present a detailed anatomical and histologic study in a 24-week-old fetus with a right-side no. 5 orbitofacial cleft (according to Tessier's classification). RESULTS: During the anatomical dissection, it was observed that in the trigeminal Gasser ganglion on the right side there was no infraorbital branch of this nerve. Both the foramen rotundum and the infraorbital groove, where the nerve exits, were hypotrophic. CONCLUSION: After embryologic analysis of their observation, the authors propose that the orbitofacial no. 5 cleft should be considered as a tissular disruption of the face secondary to damage of the terminal branches of the maxillary nerve.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".