Chemically-Induced Menopause and the Sexual Functioning of Breast Cancer Survivors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Most premenopausal women diagnosed with breast cancer receive adjuvant chemotherapy or tamoxifen. These treatments help to prevent the recurrence of breast cancer but have potentially permanent menopausal side-effects, termed chemically-induced menopause (CIM). Following a diagnosis of breast cancer and subsequent treatment, CIM and its associated side-effects may represent additional stressors for women. Thirty women participated in interviews regarding the impact of CIM on their sexual functioning. Participants were also asked about the emotional impact of these sexual changes. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using a thematic analysis technique that was informed by the constant comparison method of grounded theory. Themes emerged regarding women's experiences of: (a) the sexual changes following treatment; (b) the emotional impact of sexual changes; and, (c) moderators of the negative impact of these sexual changes. Implications are discussed with regard to counseling and current health care practices Key Words: Breast cancersexual functioningchemically-induced menopause
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it