MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1990927649 · doi:10.2991/cmes-15.2015.179

Preparation of Monodisperse Hollow Core Polymer Microspheres via Two-step Dispersion Polymerization

2015· article· en· W1990927649 on OpenAlexaff
Xiuting Jiang, Shaohui Lin, Garry L. Rempel, Qinmin Pan

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in engineering research/Advances in Engineering Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersPriority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education InstitutionsSoochow UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDispersityDispersion polymerizationMaterials scienceMicrospherePolymerDispersion (optics)PolymerizationCore (optical fiber)Chemical engineeringPolymer chemistryComposite materialOpticsPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monodisperse crosslinked polystyrene (PS) hollow core microspheres were successfully synthesized by two-step dispersion polymerization. The effects of the reaction parameters such as the crosslinking agent concentration, the initiator concentration and the monomer concentration on the particle sizes and size distribution were investigated. The results demonstrated that when the crosslinking agent concentration was low, the hollow microspheres had serious collapse, while the polymer particles became polydisperse with highly concentrated crosslinking agent. When increasing the initiator concentrations, particles with larger sizes and wider size distribution were obtained. If the initial monomer (styrene) weight fraction was too low, the honeycomb hollow ball or even solid particles would be formed, while if the monomer concentration was too high, the hollow microspheres appeared collapsed or ruptured.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in engineering research/Advances in Engineering ResearchSame topicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207