A Revised Mechanism for the Inactivation of Bovine Liver Enoyl-CoA Hydratase by (Methylenecyclopropyl)formyl-CoA Based on Unexpected Results with the C114A Mutant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The compound (methylenecyclopropyl)formyl-CoA (MCPF-CoA) has been reported earlier as a potent active site-directed inactivator of bovine liver enoyl-CoA hydratase (ECH). It is believed that the mechanism of inactivation involves the attack of Cys114 at C-2' of MCPF-CoA, resulting in ring cleavage and permanent covalent modification of the enzyme. Here, we describe studies with the C114A mutant of bovine liver ECH, which was constructed and purified to determine the role of this residue in the catalytic mechanism of the enzyme. The C114A mutant, which is catalytically competent, shows an unexpected susceptibility to inactivation by MCPF-CoA, indicating that Cys114 is not the primary nucleophile responsible for the inactivation of the enzyme. To determine if catalytic residues Glu115 and Glu135 play a role in the inactivation of the enzyme, the E115Q and E135Q mutants were also constructed and purified. It was determined that these mutants did not react with MCPF-CoA, indicating a possible role for both residues in the inactivation of the wild-type enzyme. Pepsin digestion and subsequent LC-MS/MS analysis of the inactivated wild-type enzyme and C114A mutant revealed that Glu115 was modified in each case, supporting the hypothesis that this residue is the true nucleophile that traps MCPF-CoA and indicating that the covalent modification of Cys114 reported earlier may be a postinactivation artifact. We propose a modified mechanism of inactivation involving Glu115 and Glu135, and suggest that MCPF-CoA may be a mechanism-based inhibitor for bovine liver ECH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".