Continuous Monitoring of Cerebrovascular Pressure Reactivity After Traumatic Brain Injury in Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that pressure reactivity index (PRx) values indicating preserved cerebrovascular pressure autoregulation would be associated with survival in children with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This hypothesis was tested in a prospective, blinded, observational, pilot study. METHODS: Twenty-one children admitted between May 2006 and September 2008 with severe TBI necessitating invasive intracranial pressure monitoring were enrolled in this study. The PRx was continuously monitored as a moving, linear correlation coefficient between low-frequency waves of intracranial and arterial blood pressures. Positive values of PRx approaching 1 indicate impaired cerebrovascular pressure reactivity, whereas negative PRx values or values close to 0 indicate preserved cerebrovascular pressure reactivity. Survival was the primary outcome and was compared with the average PRx value obtained during the intracranial pressure-monitoring period. RESULTS: PRx was associated with survival in this cohort; survivors (N = 15) had a mean PRx +/- SD of 0.08 +/- 0.19, and nonsurvivors (N = 6) had a mean PRx of 0.69 +/- 0.21 (P = .0009). In this sample, continuous PRx monitoring suggested impaired cerebrovascular pressure reactivity at low levels of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and intact cerebrovascular pressure reactivity at higher levels of CPP. CONCLUSIONS: Intact cerebrovascular pressure reactivity quantified with the PRx is associated with survival after severe head trauma in children. The PRx is CPP dependent in children. The PRx may be useful for defining age-specific and possibly patient-specific optimal targets for CPP after TBI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".