MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991023901 · doi:10.1117/1.jbo.17.8.086012

Diffuse optical tomographic imaging of biological media by time-dependent parabolic SPN equations: a two-dimensional study

2012· article· en· W1991023901 on OpenAlexafffund
Jorge Bouza Domínguez, Yves Bérubé-Lauzière

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomedical Optics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsDiffuse optical imagingPhoton diffusionAttenuation coefficientDiffusion equationOptical tomographyOpticsAbsorption (acoustics)Spherical harmonicsPhysicsDiffusionMathematical analysisComputational physicsMathematicsTomography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the problem of retrieving the optical properties (absorption and scattering) of biological tissue from a set of optical measurements. A diffuse optical tomography (DOT) algorithm that incorporates constrained optimization methods is implemented. To improve image quality, the DOT algorithm exploits full time-domain data. The time-dependent parabolic simplified spherical harmonics equations (TD-pSPN) are used as the forward model. Time-dependent adjoint variables are resorted to in the calculation of the gradient of the objective function. Several numerical experiments for small geometric media with embedded inclusions that mimic small animal imaging are performed. In the experiments, optical coefficient values are varied in the range of realistic values for the near-infrared spectrum, including high absorption values. Single and multiparameter reconstructions are performed with the diffusion equation and higher orders of the TD-pSPN equations. The results suggest the DOT algorithm based on the TD-pSPN model outperforms the DE, and accurately reconstructs optical parameter distributions of biological media both spatially and quantitatively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biomedical OpticsSame topicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207