MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991051393 · doi:10.1080/09243450500527879

Environmental education in three German‐speaking countries: tensions and challenges for research and development

2006· article· en· W1991051393 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jutta Nikel, Alan Reid

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Education Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Education and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Bath
KeywordsEnvironmental educationAgency (philosophy)SociologyPoliticsGermanDominance (genetics)Political scienceEducational researchEngineering ethicsSustainabilityRelation (database)Public relationsEnvironmental ethicsSocial sciencePedagogyLawEngineeringEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this article, we explore a series of issues and tensions raised by the papers in this Special Issue of Environmental Education Research. The papers focus on developments in environmental education and ESD research in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. In order to provide an alternative framework for contextualising and understanding the trends and challenges illustrated in the collection, we begin with an examination of Germany's green political movement, both at the level of national politics but also in relation to broader cultural shifts that have taken place in recent years. We then invite further debate on environmental education and ESD by focusing on three nodes within the discourse on these complex, dynamic and linked fields of theory and practice. First, we explore the themes of compatibility and compliance regarding environmental education and the 'global' as two of the key ingredients to ESD. Second, we consider the growing dominance of competency‐based approaches to ESD, primarily in terms of educational standards projects, but also in relation to images of the human therein. Third, we look into understandings of agency in relation to innovation and change, including the role of NGOs in research and policy‐making, and the sources and drivers of possible frames for future research agendas. The article ends by inviting wider discussion and critique of the achievements, tensions and challenges for research and development in environmental education and ESD, both in the three countries, and further afield. Acknowledgements We would like to thank Ingolfur Blühdorn, Stephen Gough, Kim Walker, Paul Hart, William Scott and Susanne Müller for their help in developing this piece. Notes 1. The quotations in this article from reference works in German are the translations of the authors of the article and/or the editors, unless otherwise indicated. 2. Thus, for example, in relation to the notions of thresholds and lifecycles we might wonder how environmental education has been institutionalised (and even de‐institutionalised) in the face of changing priorities within UN‐level initiatives; in what senses it has been formalised (or de‐formalised) as a governing framework for environmental learning and practice in relation to the environmental, natural and/or ecological; and so forth. 3. For example, we might envisage some correspondence here with these trends in raising questions about shifting political and cultural terrains for supporting and promoting environmental education and ESD, alongside the responses to this amongst the various communities of interest, research and practice here, including those of environmentalists, policy‐makers, transnational organisations, NGOs, and so forth. 4. Are, for that matter, the ecumenical learning initiatives distinctive here? How do they relate to other 'faith‐based' initiatives in German‐speaking countries and further afield, or how and where do they sit in relation to the broad spectrum of NGO‐type activities? 5. For example, in an editorial for the Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, Jickling (Citation2005, p. 7) asks, 'If we are entering a period of political uncertainty marked by the end of globalization, as John Ralston Saul (Citation2005) predicts, then the next decade will be crucial in shaping emerging political trends – crucial in making a difference.' How this relates to the post‐ecological thesis merits close scrutiny, as does whether the processes and effects of globalisation and its lifecycles are felt equally around the world, and among the environmental education, ESD and research communities. 6. Or, perhaps, we might consider whether the development of competency‐based approaches has more to do with, say, attempts to understand and respond to 'PISA shock' as one example of how large‐scale international comparative studies come to influence and shape educational debate and policy making. 7. Of, for example, material progress, the triumph of modern Western scientific worldviews, of human betterment, and so on. 8. What lessons can be learned from the case of Die Grünen? 9. But there is no guarantee of this final stage before a transfer phase takes place; that is, such checks and balances are built into the system of development and modelling of the innovation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Education ResearchSame topicEnvironmental Education and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207