MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991085379 · doi:10.1089/153685902321043972

Characterization of a Pan-Species Reactive Monoclonal Antibody Specific for a Cell Surface Epitope Which Could Serve as a Marker for Human Monocytic and Megakaryocytic Differentiation

2002· article· en· W1991085379 on OpenAlexaff
Chew Shun Chang, Grant McFadden

Bibliographic record

VenueHybridoma and Hybridomics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster of differentiationMonoclonal antibodyEpitopeMolecular biologyBiologyCellular differentiationK562 cellsCell cultureIn vitroAntibodyMyeloidCellCell biologyImmunologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mouse IgG(1)-producing hybridoma, CSC-31, was isolated and characterized. The monoclonal antibody (MAb) was originally raised against monkey kidney cell-surface molecules. FACS analysis further showed that CSC-31 exhibited broad tissue and species reactivity. Although most human T- and B-cell lines failed to react with CSC-31, myeloid, and erythroleukemia cells lines such as THP-1 and K562 expressed the CSC-31 cell surface marker. Furthermore, in vitro differentiation of HL-60, U-937, and K562 showed that expression of the CSC-31 marker is associated with monocytic or megakaryocytic differentiation. However, up-regulation of the CSC-31 marker expression was not detected during granulocytic or erythroid differentiation. Through the in vitro differentiation of K562, it was demonstrated that up-regulation of the CSC-31 marker required novel PKCs and might be regulated by the MAPK signaling pathway. Last, limited biochemical analysis demonstrated that the CSC-31-specific epitope is sensitive to digestion by papain yet highly resistant to other proteases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHybridoma and HybridomicsSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207