Inexpensive, high‐quality optical relay for use in confocal scanning beam imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An inexpensive, high optical-quality relay lens made up of two eyepieces arranged in an afocal assembly for use in confocal scanning laser imaging is described. In the past we have used relays, within our confocal microscopes, made up of achromats with long focal lengths (> or = 10 cm), which take up large optical tracks and suffer from significant amounts of astigmatism and curvature of field. We quantify aberrations associated with achromat and eyepiece relays using CODE V optical design and analysis software. The eyepiece relay is found to be more compact, better corrected, and not significantly more expensive than its achromat counterpart. In addition to being used to interconnect two scanning mirrors optically as well as scanning mirrors with microscope objectives, it can form part of the optics in a confocal scanning laser MACROscope-Microscope system (Biomedical Photometrics, Inc., Waterloo, Ontario, Canada). Due to design constraints, the MACROscope-Microscope system cannot incorporate a conventional wide-field microscope into its structure such as is done in most commercial confocal microscopes. The eyepiece relay is used as a stand-alone, compact optical link between the scanning mirrors and the microscope objective. This consequently makes the MACROscope-Microscope system more compact and easier to commercialize.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".