MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991172780 · doi:10.1080/07315724.2014.943851

Adherence to a DASH-Style Diet in Relation to Stroke: A Case-Control Study

2015· article· en· W1991172780 on OpenAlexaff
Mahdieh Niknam, Mohammad Saadatnia, Forough Shakeri, Ammar Hassanzadeh Keshteli, Parvane Saneei, Ahmad Esmaillzadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American College of Nutrition · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutritional Studies and Diet
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDashMedicineDASH dietQuartileStroke (engine)Diabetes mellitusInternal medicineNeurologyPhysical therapyCase-control studyEndocrinologyBlood pressureConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Despite the growing body of evidence from Western societies on the association between dietary patterns and stroke, limited data are available in this regard from developing countries. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to examine the association between adherence to the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet and risk of stroke among the Iranian population. METHODS: This hospital-based case-control study included 194 stroke patients and 194 controls and was conducted at the Alzahra University Hospital, Isfahan, Iran. The cases were stroke patients who were hospitalized in the neurology ward of the Alzahra University Hospital. Controls were randomly selected from among hospitalized patients in the orthopedic or surgical wards of this center. A validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was used to assess the patients' usual dietary intake. We constructed the DASH diet score based on food and nutrients emphasized or minimized in the DASH diet. RESULTS: The prevalence of stroke among those in the top quartile of the DASH diet score was 40%, which was 15% lower than among those in the bottom quartile; this difference was marginally significant (p = 0.10). After controlling for age, sex, and total energy intake, adherence to the DASH diet was inversely associated with the risk of stroke (OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.28; 0.98). These associations remained significant even after additionally controlling for physical activity, smoking, hypertension, and diabetes, such that individuals in the highest quartile of the DASH diet score had a 58% lower risk of stroke than those in the lowest category (OR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.96). However, after further adjustment for body mass index (BMI), the association disappeared (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.29, 1.31), indicating an obesity-dependent association. CONCLUSION: We found an inverse relationship between the DASH-style diet and prevalence of stroke. Prospective studies are needed to confirm this association.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American College of NutritionSame topicNutritional Studies and DietFrench-language works237,207