Phase Shifting the Hamster Circadian Clock by 15-Minute Dark Pulses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mammalian circadian pacemaker can be phase shifted by exposure to a period of darkness interrupting otherwise continuous light. Circadian phase shifting by dark pulses was interpreted originally as reflecting a photic mirror-image mechanism, but more recent observations suggest that dark pulse-induced phase shifting may be mediated by a nonphotic, behavioral state-dependent mechanism. The authors recently presented evidence indicating that the dark-pulse phase response curve (PRC) is in fact a complex function, reflecting both photic mirror image and nonphotic mechanisms at different phases of the circadian cycle. Previous studies of dark pulse-induced phase shifting have universally employed relatively long (2 to 6 h) pulses, which complicates PRC analysis due to the extended segment of the underlying PRC spanned by such a long pulse. The present study was therefore designed to examine the phase-shifting effects of brief 15-min dark pulses presented at both mid-subjective day and subjective dusk, and to explore the possible activity dependence of these effects by using physical restraint to prevent evoked locomotor activity. The results indicate that 15-min dark pulses are effective phase-shifting stimuli at both midday and dusk. Furthermore, as with longer dark pulses, phase shifting by 15-min dark pulses is completely blocked by physical restraint during subjective day but combines in a simple additive manner with the independent phase-shifting effect of restraint at subjective dusk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".