SHRIMP UPb geochronology of detrital zircons from the Treasure Lake Group new evidence for Paleoproterozoic collisional tectonics in the southern Hottah terrane, northwestern Canadian Shield
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The recently defined Treasure Lake Group is a platformal sedimentary sequence more than 3 km thick that was deformed and metamorphosed prior to formation of the Great Bear continental arc during 18751845 Ma. The group is exposed as remnants in the southern part of the arc. Its basement is not exposed, but is interpreted to comprise the Paleoproterozoic Hottah terrane, which is exposed at Hottah Lake in the northern part of the arc. Studies in that region show that the Hottah terrane collided with the Archean Slave craton to the east ca. 1883 Ma following reversal of subduction polarity from west to east. Continued eastward subduction under the collision zone formed the Great Bear arc. The present study was undertaken to determine the age and provenance of the Treasure Lake Group. Thirty-nine detrital zircon grains from a sample of a quartz arenite unit in the middle part of the Treasure Lake Group were analyzed by SHRIMP (sensitive high-resolution ion microprobe). They show an age range from ca. 2729 to ca. 1880 Ma, with main modes at ca. 1895, 1985, 2090, and 2330 Ma. These data confirm a mainly Paleoproterozoic provenance for the group. The youngest group of five zircon analyses places the maximum depositional age at 1886 ± 8 Ma. The Treasure Lake Group is close to the north-trending Wopmay medial zone formed during collision of the Hottah terrane and the Slave craton. Deformation and metamorphism of the group can now be attributed to the collisional event. The group may in part be coeval with the Bell Island Bay and Akaitcho groups of the northern Hottah terrane, the lower parts of which were deposited ca. 1900 Ma. The wide range of detrital zircons ages found in this study is interpreted to reflect a complex Paleoproterozoic evolution of the Hottah terrane.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".