Experimental evaluation of creep and fatigue behaviour for microscale solder interconnect
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper presents a novel experimental study for creep and fatigue of solder‐interconnects in microstructures. The strains are directly measured in the fillet area of solder‐joints with a typical linear dimension of 50 μm. An analytical approach is developed for calculating shear stress based on the shear strain measurement and the established solder constitutive relations. Also obtained is the strain‐rate as well as the separated elastic, plastic and creep components from the measured total strain. The data enables the determination of the strain energy density per temperature cycle for the characterization of the solder joint creep fatigue behaviour. Case studies provide evidence for the shear dominance and the creep fatigue mechanism in thermally induced solder joint deformation in surface‐mounted electronic assemblies. Though a similar trend of variation in stress–strain is found in the joints of different solders, the substantial differences in the hysteresis loop area and shape as well as in the creep rate suggest that the solder constitutive parameters should have a profound impact on the creep fatigue endurance of the joints.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".