Antioxidant responses to variations of oxygen by the Harderian gland of different species of the superspecies Spalax ehrenbergi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The subterranean blind mole rats of the superspecies Spalax ehrenbergi (Nehring, 1898) have developed several strategies to cope with changing concentrations of underground oxygen. Such an atmosphere induces the generation of reactive oxygen species that can cause oxidative damage without proper control. To understand how S. ehrenbergi appear to be able to counteract the free radicals and avoid oxidative damage, we studied the oxidative status of the Harderian gland (an organ particularly vulnerable to oxidative stress in many rodents) in two species of the superspecies S. ehrenbergi ( Spalax galili and Spalax judaei ) under different oxygen concentration levels, paying special attention to the antioxidant defences developed by these animals and the resulting macromolecular damage. The results presented herein reinforce the idea that S. ehrenbergi deal better with hypoxic conditions than other rodents by regulating the activity of its antioxidant enzymes. Moreover, S. galili is better adapted to hypoxic conditions, whereas S. judaei appears to be better adapted to hyperoxic conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".