Isolation of new probes in the region of the Wilson disease locus, 13q14.2→q14.3
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A hybrid panel was used to refine the localizations of eight established markers useful for the diagnosis of Wilson disease. Two of the markers, D13S59 and D13S31, that map very close to the Wilson disease locus (WND) were localized to the region 13q14.2-->q14.3. We report the isolation of seven new probes from this region, using two different approaches. First, 16 clones from a chromosome 13-specific library were mapped using the hybrid panel. Three of the clones mapped to 13q14.2-->q14.3. As a second approach, Alu element-mediated PCR (Alu-PCR) was used to generate clones from a hybrid (ICD) that contains the proximal half of chromosome 13 as the only human component. To select for those that potentially mapped within the region 13q14.2-->q14.3, the clones were screened by differential hybridization using the labeled Alu-PCR products from a hybrid (KSF39) that is similar to ICD but has a deletion in the region 13q14.2-->q14.3. The procedure was successful even though KSF39 contains five additional human chromosomes. Six independent clones were selected. Five of these were found to be nonrepetitive, and four were found to map correctly to 13q14.2-->q14.3 when localized using the hybrid panel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it