PSEUDOANEURYSM OF THE SUPERIOR MESENTERIC ARTERY AFTER PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION TREATED BY ENDOVASCULAR STENTING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pseudoaneurysm after pancreas transplantation can have serious consequences, including rupture, hemorrhage, and graft loss. We describe a 38-year-old patient who presented with a pseudoaneurysm of the donor superior mesenteric artery 1 month after pancreas transplantation. Selective arteriography was performed and the lesion was repaired with endovascular placement of a 28-mm covered stent. Laparotomy was avoided. The pancreatic graft was continuing to function well 9 months later. As far as we know, this minimally invasive approach was not previously reported. According to published series, pseudoaneurysms often occur secondary to infection and require operative intervention necessitating graft pancreatectomy. Patients can present with serious symptoms including hypotension and shock. Therefore, it is important to detect pseudoaneurysm in a timely manner. Computed tomography and Doppler ultrasound are important diagnostic tools in this regard. We demonstrated the utility of endovascular stenting in the treatment of pseudoaneurysm after pancreas transplantation. When used in a timely manner in well selected patients, endovascular stenting can abrogate the need for operative intervention and its attendant morbidity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".