MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W199141281 · doi:10.82308/4509

The boundary element method for linear acoustic systems

2008· article· en· W199141281 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Simon de Leon

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic Technology and Sound Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsBoundary element methodPolygon meshBoundary (topology)Topology (electrical circuits)AcousticsFinite element methodTransient (computer programming)Mesh generationWaveguideComputer scienceSoftwareBoundary value problemMathematical analysisPhysicsEngineeringMathematicsOpticsStructural engineeringElectrical engineeringComputer graphics (images)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Une technique de simulation numérique des systèmes acoustiques linéaires tridimensionnels basée sur la méthode d'éléments de frontière transitoires est présentée. La librairie Matlab \texttt{Distmesh} \cite{persson:2004} a été employée pour générer des maillages représentant la surface de tels objets. La pression en tout point du volume est obtenue par intégration des potentiels tout au long du maillage. Ainsi les calculs aux noeuds du maillage de même que les inexactitudes de topologies connexes dans le volume sont évités. Dans le cadre de la simulation d'instruments percussifs, le mouvement de la membrane est modélisé au moyen de guides d'ondes bidimensionnels particulièrement bien adaptés à une topologie triangulaire non-structurée. L'effet de couplage dû aux pressions internes est aussi pris en compte. D'autre part, la réponse caractéristique d'un tube droit, ouvert aux deux bouts obtenue par cette méthode est comparée aux résultats d'une méthode basée sur les guides d'ondes monodimensionnels. Enfin, de possibles applications du logiciel developpé pendant ce projet (et librement disponible) sont présentées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0070.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicMusic Technology and Sound StudiesFrench-language works237,207