MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991421827 · doi:10.1139/e04-076

Depositional and tectonic setting of the Miocene Wood Mountain Formation, southern Saskatchewan

2004· article· en· W1991421827 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Dale A. Leckie, J M Bednarski, Harvey R. Young

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsBrandon UniversityGeological Survey of CanadaNexen (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyAggradationTectonic upliftSedimentary depositional environmentGeomorphologyTectonicsErosionGeochemistrySubaerialDeposition (geology)SinuosityPaleontologyFluvialSedimentStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coarse gravels of the Miocene Wood Mountain Formation that cap the Wood Mountain upland in southern Saskatchewan are an erosional remant of a much more expansive sheet of gravel and sand. The formation consists of gravel and sand deposited as a thin sheet on a regional planation surface that extends approximately along strike for at least 160 km. This sheet, with a maximum thickness of 31 m, is the deposit of low-sinuosity, braided-river channels that flowed to the north-northeast. The Wood Mountain Formation represents an initial episode of erosion followed by low-accommodation deposition, where the net aggradation rate was likely low. The sediments of the Wood Mountain Formation are associated with change in tectonic style in western North America from one of compression to one of extension. The gravels were deposited above a regional erosion surface associated with isostatic uplift of the central Montana Uplift.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207