On the determination of the glass forming ability of AlxZr1−x alloys using molecular dynamics, Monte Carlo simulations, and classical thermodynamics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, the glass forming ability of Al-Zr alloys is quantified using Monte Carlo (MC) and molecular dynamic (MD) simulations as well as classical thermodynamic calculations. The total energy of each studied structure of the Al-Zr system is described using the modified embedded atom model in the second-nearest-neighbour formalism. The parameterized Al-Zr cross potential which has been extensively validated using available experimental and ab initio data for several solid structures and for the liquid phase is used to evaluate thermodynamic, structural, and physical properties of the glass state and of the fully disordered (FD) face-centered cubic (FCC) solid solution with no short range order (SRO). The local environment of the Al-Zr amorphous phase is identified to be similar to that of a FCC solid structure with short range chemical order. A new approach to model the Gibbs energy of the amorphous phase based on the cluster variation method in the tetrahedron approximation is presented. The Gibbs energy of the fully disordered FCC solid solution with no short range order is determined and compared to the Gibbs energy of the amorphous phase. According to our volumetric and energetic criteria defined in our work to evaluate the possible formation of a glass structure at room temperature and zero pressure, a glass forming range of (0.25≤XZr≤0.75) and of (0.21≤XZr≤0.75) are identified, respectively. All the available quantitative experimental data regarding the amorphization of Al-Zr alloys are compared to the prediction of our MD/MC simulations throughout this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".