Intraductal tubular adenoma (pyloric gland‐type) of the pancreas: a reappraisal and possible relationship with gastric‐type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Intraductal tubular adenoma (ITA) is an uncommon intraluminal polypoid lesion that occurs in the main pancreatic duct and involves the main pancreatic duct in the region of head or body. Three cases of ITA are presented, the literature reviewed and their association with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is postulated. METHODS AND RESULTS: ITA is composed of tightly packed tubular structures with focal cystic dilation and papillary areas lined by gastric/pyloric epithelium showing minimal to mild cytological atypia. Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) 1A and B was present in smaller ducts of all cases. In addition, in the cases in this report and 50% of cases reported in the literature, an associated gastric-type IPMN was present in the same duct as the ITA or in adjacent ducts. The coexistence of ITA and IPMN and the similarities of their epithelial lining (gastric/pyloric mucosa) suggest a possible pathogenic link. CONCLUSIONS: ITA can occur without (type A) or with (type B) an associated gastric-type IPMN. ITA could represent a localized, polypoid form of gastric-type IPMN.It is a benign lesion with no evidence of invasion and no direct tumour-related deaths. Its relationship to intraductal tubular carcinoma remains to be elucidated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".