MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Factors Related to Six-minute Walk Test Results in Adults with Cerebral Palsy

2008· article· en· W1991581306 on OpenAlexaffabout
Désirée B. Maltais, Michelle-Nancy Robitaille, Francine Dumas, Normand Boucher, Carol L. Richards

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsometric exerciseCerebral palsyPhysical therapyMedicineHeart ratePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPartial correlationPreferred walking speedGross Motor Function Classification SystemSittingPsychologyCorrelationBlood pressureMathematicsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As adults with cerebral palsy (CP) grow older, there is an increased risk for their walking capacity to decrease which could lead to less social participation, poorer health and decreased quality of life. Although the six-minute walk test (6MWT) has demonstrated reliability for this group, it has rarely been used to assess their functional walking capacity and its physiologic correlates are not known. PURPOSE: To describe in adults with CP, relationships between the 6MWT distance and selected physiologic and related measures. METHODS: Sixteen men and 4 women (21-41 yrs) with CP performed the 6MWT during which time oxygen consumption (VO2) and heart rate (HR) were assessed. The following were also measured; HR, blood pressure and VO2 at rest, height, weight, gross motor function (Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM)), the preferred walking speed over 5 m, and isometric knee extensor strength (hand-held dynamometer). Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to define the relationships between the 6MWT distance and each of the independent variables. Step-wise regression analysis assessed the inter-relationships between the 6MWT and factors that were significant (p < 0.05) in the correlational analysis. RESULTS: The variables significantly correlated (r) to the 6MWT distance were; resting HR (−0.54), minute 6 VO2 per kg body mass (0.45), minute 6 VO2 per meter walked (−0.78), the GMFM total score (0.89), the GMFM-D score related to standing (0.91), the GMFM-E score related walking (0.94), walking speed over 5 m (0.89), and knee extensor strength on the dominant (0.60) and non-dominant (0.66) sides. Step-wise regression showed that together, the GMFM-E score, minute 6 VO2 per kg body mass, and the 5 m walking speed explained 90% of the variance in the 6MWT distance. CONCLUSION: For adults with CP, the 6MWT is especially related (positively) to gross motor function skills associated with walking. These skills and high energy expenditure during minute 6 of the test explain most of the variance in 6MWT results. Further research is needed to determine, for this population, if the 6MWT tracks changes in walking capacity over time and if improved gross motor skills related to walking result in improved walking capacity as assessed by this test. Supported by CIRRIS and the Laval University Research Chair in Cerebral Palsy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders→French-language works237,207→