MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991623123 · doi:10.1167/12.9.1369

Using a Modified Shape Discrimination Task to Assess the Interaction Between Low- and Mid-Level Visual Processes as a Function of Development

2012· article· en· W1991623123 on OpenAlexaff
A. Perreault, Claudine Habak, V. Bao, F. Leporé, Armando Bertone

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vision · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicColor perception and design
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLuminanceTexture (cosmology)PerceptionPsychologyMathematicsSet (abstract data type)Contrast (vision)AudiologyPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceCognitive psychologyMedicineImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Most studies investigating visual development have assessed lower (local) and higher (global) levels of processing in isolation. It therefore remains unknown whether immature perception at one level affects processing in the other as a function of development. The objective of the present study was to assess the typical development of low- to mid-level visual processes by evaluating the discrimination of circular shapes (global) differing in local attributes: luminance and texture. Methods: Typically developing school-aged children (n = 11, 7-12 years olds), adolescents (n = 13, 13-17 years old) and adults (n = 13, 18-25 years old) were asked to discriminate a deformed circle (target) from a pure circle in a 2-ATFC using the method of constant stimuli; deformation thresholds were measured. Stimuli consisted of radial frequency patterns: circular contours with a varying number of bumps or deformations (radial frequencies (RFs) of 3, 5, and 10), which establishes the global shape. The amount of deformation is set by the amplitude or size of the bumps (dependent measure), and the patterns are defined by either luminance or texture (local information). Results: A 3-way mixed factorial analysis revealed a Group x Local Attribute interaction, demonstrating that for both luminance and texture patterns, the school-aged group performed significantly worse compared to adolescents and adults. No significant difference between adolescents and adults was identified. A Local Attribute x RF interaction was also demonstrated, with discrimination thresholds for luminance-defined patterns differing significantly across all RFs. Alternatively, for texture-defined patterns, discrimination thresholds did not differ for RFs of 5 and 10. Conclusions: These results suggest that the typical development of low- to mid-level visual processes is only influenced by the type of local attributes (luminance vs texture) and not by the number of RFs defining the contour. Overall, immature low-level visual processes can potentially affect higher-level perception. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2012

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.218
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of VisionSame topicColor perception and designFrench-language works237,207