MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991645605 · doi:10.1094/pdis.2000.84.2.198c

First Report of Phytoplasmas in Soybean, Alfalfa, and <i>Lupinus</i> sp. in Lithuania

2000· article· en· W1991645605 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. Jomantienė, Robert E. Davis, L. Antoniuk, J. Staniulis

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhytoplasmaBiologyAster yellowsRestriction fragment length polymorphismHaeIII16S ribosomal RNALupinusLupinus angustifoliusPrimer (cosmetics)Nested polymerase chain reactionBotanyBroomPolymerase chain reactionGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plants of cultivated soybean (Glycine max) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa) in Dotnuva and of wild Lupinus sp. in Ledakalnis, Lithuania, exhibited symptoms that suggested phytoplasmal infections. Soybean plants were of normal growth habit but exhibited veinal necrosis. Alfalfa and Lupinus plants exhibited stunting, abnormally small leaves, and witches'-broom symptoms. Diseases in the plants were termed soybean veinal necrosis (SVN), alfalfa stunt (AlfS), and Lupinus stunt (LupS), respectively. The presence of phytoplasmas in diseased plants was assessed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for amplification of phytoplasma-specific 16S rDNA. A phytoplasma-characteristic 1.2-kbp DNA fragment was amplified from all diseased plants but not from known healthy plants in nested PCRs in which the first DNA amplification was primed by primer pair P1/P7 and reamplification of DNA was primed by primer pair F2n/R2 (2,4). Products from the nested PCR primed by F2n/R2 were subjected to restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis, and the RFLP patterns obtained were compared with patterns previously published (1-4). On the basis of AluI, HaeIII, HhaI, HpaI, KpnI, MseI, and RsaI RFLP patterns, the SVN and LupS phytoplasmas were classified in group 16SrIII (peach X-disease phytoplasma group), subgroup B (III-B, type strain clover yellow edge phytoplasma), and the AlfS phytoplasma was classified in group 16SrI (aster yellows phytoplasma group), subgroup B (I-B, type strain aster yellows phytoplasma). Nucleotide sequences were determined for 16S rDNA fragments amplified from SVN and AlfS phytoplasmas in nested PCRs primed by F2n/R2. The sequences were deposited in GenBank under Accession nos. AF177383 for SVN and AF177384 for AlfS. Sequence similarity between the 16S rDNAs of SVN and Canadian clover yellow edge (strain CYE-C, GenBank Accession no. AF175304) phytoplasmas was 99.8%; sequence similarity between 16S rDNAs of AlfS and aster yellows (strain SAY, GenBank Accession no. M86340) phytoplasmas was 99.6%. The SVN phytoplasma 16S rDNA shared 100% sequence similarity with a 16S rDNA from the Lithuanian clover yellow edge (CYE-L, GenBank Accession no. AF173558) phytoplasma. The nucleotide sequence data supported the conclusion that the SVN and AlfS phytoplasmas were closely related to strains classified in subgroups III-B and I-B, respectively. Our findings extend the known geographic ranges of phytoplasma subgroups I-B and III-B to northern Europe, including Lithuania, and expand the known plant host ranges of these pathogens. References: (1) R. E. Davis et al. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47:262, 1997. (2) R. Jomantiene et al. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 48:269, 1998. (3) R. Jomantiene et al. HortScience 33:1069, 1998. (4) I.-M. Lee et al. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 48:1153, 1998.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPhytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogensFrench-language works237,207