Orientation and dispersal of hatchling Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii) from experimental nests
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We determined initial dispersal directions of 1052 naïve and 278 experienced hatchling Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii (Holbrook, 1838)) in experimental arenas in a variety of settings. Dispersal of naïve hatchlings was nonrandom in 7 of 10 sites. All nonrandom dispersal patterns suggested hatchlings primarily used vision to orient toward dark far horizons, particularly those associated with riparian habitats. We found no evidence that hatchlings use positive geotaxis, olfaction, humidity gradients, or scent trailing of other individuals during dispersal. Despite the lack of relationships between the changing position of the sun and relationships between nest sites and wetlands, patterns of dispersal were different for hatchlings released in the morning and late afternoon at two sites. Comparisons of the dispersal of naïve and translocated experienced hatchlings (those with previous exposure to environmental cues) suggest that hatchlings develop a sun compass within 2 days of emergence from nests. Based on all nonrandom dispersals of hatchlings at arenas, the estimated maximum perception distance of hatchlings was 325 m. In some situations, forest succession, agriculture activities, and introduction of pine trees may increase risks faced by hatchlings dispersing from nests by reducing their ability to find wetlands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".