Single Point Mooring System for an Offshore LNG Import Terminal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The paper describes the conceptual design of an offshore LNG import terminal based on the 'Bishop Process', sited on Vermilion, block 179, offshore Louisiana. It clarifies the Basis of Design for the complete terminal and describes the design and verification process followed for the Single Point Mooring ystem for offloading of LNG. The work done to date confirms the technical and economical feasibility of the concept. Although new in configuration, most of the individual components have been in use for LNG terminals and SPM systems for a long time. Introduction The US is currently by far the world's largest gas market. Of the current supply 85% is produced within the US, and 15% is imported; 98% from Canada and only 2% in the form of LNG. Whereas US demand is expected to grow with 2% per annum, the current U.S. gas production shows an increasing intrinsic decline rate and more undiscovered gas reserves are needed each year to keep up with demand. E&P operations in new frontier areas (e.g. the Alaskan North slope) are unlikely to be allowed in the near future and gradually the realization is dawning that only large scale LNG imports can meet the expected demand and stabilize the price of natural gas. In its annual outlook for 2004 the US Energy Information Administration predicts that LNG imports will grow from a modest 0.2 tcf in 2002 to 4.8 tcf or 15% of expected total supply by 2025[1]. Although new liquefaction projects for gas are being sanctioned, community concerns, congested ports, security and cost considerations are seen to frustrate the development of significant increases in capacities to receive LNG in the US but also in Europe. This paper describes the conceptual design for an offshore LNG import terminal based on the 'Bishop Process', which is developed as part of a research project sponsored by the US Department of Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory. Ten companies, ranging from operators, mid stream companies, contractors and equipment vendors are participating in this project. The objective of this cooperative research is to design, construct, field test and evaluate the performance of key components of a salt cavern based LNG receiving facility and to describe their application in LNG receiving facilities in the Gulf coast and North-East US. Salt cavern based LNG import terminals have material advantages over tank design terminals in capital costs, operating costs, volume of storage, send out rates, security, and acceptance by the community[2]. As a consequence of the abundant appearance of salt formations found in the Gulf region in combination with hydrocarbon accumulations, the concept has very high potential in this region: not only is the connecting infrastructure to the US gas distribution system in place, it is also underutilized because of declining production and thus there is capacity available to handle large volumes of LNG imports.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".