MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991726732 · doi:10.3366/rom.2007.13.1.63

Inuit Diasporas: Frankenstein and the Inuit in England

2007· article· en· W1991726732 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karen Piper

Bibliographic record

VenueRomanticism · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryNorth poleNew englandAppealArtArt historyGeographyPoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

first edition of Frankenstein, the Isabella and Alexander set forth from England on a journey of exploration to the North Pole, carrying a Greenlandic Inuit from Disko Island by the name of John Sackhouse. Sackhouse, who had previously stowed away on a whaler from Greenland to Scotland, would serve as the translator on this voyage, enabling communication with the Inuit people along the way. While the Isabella and Alexander were searching for a Northwest Passage across northern America, the Dorothea and Trent headed ‘across the north pole’, hoping to meet the Isabella and Alexander at the Bering Strait. At the time, it was believed that the North Pole was ‘free of ice’, making a meeting like this possible. Mary Shelley, an avid reader of the Quarterly Review between 1816 and 1820, followed speculations surrounding these journeys in preparation for writing Frankenstein. Frankenstein, in fact, could be said to capitalize on the suspense and widely popular appeal of these journeys. Perhaps not coincidentally, the release of her novel appeared to be timed to coincide with the advent of these infamous expeditions to the North. Besides being captivated by the expeditions themselves, the English public had long been fascinated by Greenlandic Inuits and Eskimos. I would argue that, in Frankenstein, the creature himself came to represent these inhabitants of the North, as well as the threat of their arrival in England if increased communication were to occur. Just as John Sackhouse had once arrived as a stowaway on British shores, so Frankenstein’s creature is a stranger who must be incorporated in – or rejected from – European culture. In the novel, the ‘birth’ of the creature in Europe could be said to represent cultural fears of the invasion of the ‘primitive’ in ‘civilized’ society, or the arrival of the colonized, in search of revenge, on the shores of the colonizer. Since the late sixteenth century, ‘Esquimaux Indians’ from Greenland to Alaska had been captured by British explorers and carried back to England, where they were generally presented as novelties to the King or Queen. In 1576, Martin Frobisher captured a Greenlandic Inuit who was later described in London as ‘such a wonder unto the whole city and to the rest of the realm that heard of it’ (Oswalt, 27). In 1578, Eskimos captured off Baffin Island were given permission by the Queen to hunt swans on the Thames River. In 1605, an Inuit performed before the King and Queen of Denmark, racing their traditional kayaks against a Danish boat. By the late eighteenth century, discussions of these ‘Esquimaux Indians’ peppered the pages of books and journals ranging from the Quarterly Review to John Pinkerton’s famous collection, A General Collection of the Best and Most Interesting Voyages and Travels in all Parts of the World. Karen Piper

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRomanticismSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207