Fabrication and Reaction Mechanism of <i>In Situ</i> TiC and TiB<sub>2 </sub>Reinforced Mg Matrix Composites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TiC and TiB 2 compounds in the form of interpenetrating network reinforced AZ91D magnesium matrix composites have been successfully synthesized by an in-situ reactive infiltration technique. In this process, the ceramic reinforcement phases, TiC and TiB 2 , were synthesized in-situ from elemental powders of Ti and B 4 C without any addition of a third metal powder such as Al. The molten Mg alloy infiltrates the preform of Ti p and B 4 C p by the capillary force. The microstructure and reaction mechanism are investigated using SEM/EDS and XRD analysis. The results show that the processing parameters such as temperature, holding time and the green compact relative density have a significant influence on the reaction mechanism and the fabrication of the composite. In addition, the infiltrated Mg acts as an intermediary that makes the reaction possible at a lower temperature than that required for solid-state reaction between Ti and B 4 C. Microstructural characterization reveals a relatively uniform distribution of the reinforcing phases, TiC and TiB 2 in the Mg matrix.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".