The evolution of vacancy-type defects in silicon-on-insulator structures studied by positron annihilation spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Variable-energy positron annihilation spectroscopy (VEPAS) has been applied to the study of the formation and evolution of vacancy-type defect structures in silicon (Si) and the 1.5 μm thick Si top layer of silicon-on-insulator (SOI) samples. The samples were implanted with 2 MeV Si ions at fluences between 1013 and 1015 cm−2, and probed in the as-implanted state and after annealing for 30 min at temperatures between 350 and 800 °C. In the case of SOI the ions were implanted such that their profile was predominantly in the insulating buried oxide layer, and thus their ability to combine with vacancies in the top Si layer, and that of other interstitials beyond the buried oxide, was effectively negated. No measurable differences in the positron response to the evolution of small clusters of n vacancies (Vn, n ∼ 3) in the top Si layer of the Si and SOI samples were observed after annealing up to 500 °C; at higher temperatures, however, this response persisted in the SOI samples as that in Si decreased toward zero. At 700 and 800 °C the damage in Si was below detectable levels, but the VEPAS response in the top Si layer in the SOI was consistent with the development of nanovoids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".